Three different roses blooming on April 1st? I understand that two of them have Rugosa blood and the third is normally an early rose; but April 1st? 'Marie Bugnet' is normally the first rose to bloom for me, starting, on average in the 1st week of May. The earliest bloom I ever saw on that bush was April 21st, in 2009. The next earliest was April 23rd, in 2005. April 1st?: preposterous! 'Harison's Yellow' has only bloomed once in April in 10 years; on April 30th, 2005. This cosmic scheduling is ridiculous. The lilacs are in peak bloom here. My earliest peony (Paeonia tenuifolia) and my earliest iris ('First Edition') have just started blooming. Tulips are starting to open. Clematis montana has just started to bloom. Daffodils have just slacked off. And my roses are blooming? A closer look reveals that rosebuds are developing on most all of my rosebushes, but perhaps in less than normal number. I'm all for being able to enjoy the scent of roses early for the season, but at this rate, we'll be done with roses blooming by May and their normal abundance may be lessened.
Looking at the odd bloom sequence, I believe what it tells me is that the bulbs and other flowers dependent on ground temperature for growth initiation are blooming closer to their "normal" time, while the plants dependent on air temperature to develop buds are being pushed by the (today) 90F degree temperatures. That's my theory anyway, and I'm sticking to it.
I know it's April 1st, folks, but this is no April Fool's. I took these pictures today, April 1, 2012. God Save the Planet.