The selection of roses for planting is such a fickle action at times. I sometimes seek out specific roses based on their reputations, while at other times I'm struck by a photograph in a catalogue, or an intriguing hint dropped in another blog. As a result, there are roses in my garden that I take almost for granted. Hardly noticed for their temporary beauty, they fill in spaces and trundle on year after year, never causing trouble sufficient to sentence them to elimination by spade, nor causing enough excitement to move them to a more prominent position.
Such a rose, in my garden, is the Centifolia 'Fantin-Latour'. I obtained her ten or eleven years ago, I believe, from Suzy Verrier's former Royall River Rose Nursery, and she has long been one of the non-remonant roses that border my back patio. Of unknown provenance, discovered before 1938, she is undeniably beautiful in bloom, a light blush pink with sometimes a green center, and her fragrance is sweet and very strong. When she is without bloom, however, she's a stiff, rangy shrub that wants to sprawl 4 feet in all directions and stands about 4 feet tall as well. I would give her better marks for appearance if she was the sole rose at the party, but placed in my garden next to my favorite 'Madame Hardy', she always comes off as a poor second choice for a dance partner. 'Fantin-Latour is less-refined and more loosely arranged in blossom than 'Madame Hardy', she hasn't nearly as tight or shapely legs, and she's much more awkward in appearance. Her stiff canes are gawky and never clothed with short stems or flowers, completely naked, in essence, from the waist down. In a Romance novel, 'Madame Hardy' would be the prim and proper Lady of the manor, 'Fantin-Latour' the blushing but willing peasant milkmaid who pleasures the Lord on his daily travels.
I don't intend, by that comparison, any ill will towards peasant milkmaids, many of whom star in my nightly dreams just as 'Fantin-Latour' graces my garden. 'Fantin-Latour' is of hardy stock, whoever her parents were, and she has no winter dieback here in Kansas. She gets a little minimal fungus occasionally, so I watch her for blackspot a bit when the weather is most humid in order to keep as many leaves covering her angular frame as possible. The blossoms, cupped and very double, are a little disheveled at times, and they also get a smidgen of botrytis blight in cool wet weather, but in warm dry sun they are the equal of any beautiful rose in my garden. The biggest positive of 'Fantin-Latour', in my mind, has been the absolute lack of care she needs. The picture above is from 2008, blooming her head off in late Spring, and the picture at the bottom is from this past summer, halfway through a drought. Her appearance is almost identical and I haven't taken a pruner to her at all during those years, except to remove a dead cane or two. No gardener could ask for an easier rose to care for, nor a more beautiful one. I, for one, will always be able to overlook her wanton desire to sprawl across my garden beds just as long as she is willing to provide an annual burst of fragrant blooms.
Though an old gardener, I am but a young blogger. The humor and added alliteration are free.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Sunday, March 24, 2013
A Spring Proposal
It is Spring, correct? Because ProfessorRoush is having a difficult time this morning discerning a difference from the Winter he experienced just a few days ago. On this, the fourth day past the Spring equinox of 2013, it is currently 27°F in Manhattan, Kansas and the wind is out of due North at 15mph with gusts up to 22mph. We have, as of last count, 4.6 inches estimated new snow on the ground since 7:00 p.m. yesterday.
Enough for statistics. Mark Twain, once said there "are three kinds of lies, lies, damn lies, and statistics." Well, at least most scholars attribute it to Mark Twain; Twain, himself, claimed to be quoting Benjamin Disraeli but the statement cannot be found in Disraeli's private or published works. So the authorship of this quote may be as misleading as are statistics themselves. And anyway, Mark Twain was just a pen name for Samuel Clements; why do we attribute quotes to Mark Twain instead of Samuel Clements? Anyone?
Enough for both Mark Twain and statistics. What the statistics of the daily weather hide is that, as you can plainly see, my little "sun face" on the garage wall looks a little blue at the moment. And that, as you can see in the picture below, part of the ground in my garden is almost clear and other parts have drifts over a foot tall. And that, if I take a step outside the door to pick up the Sunday morning paper, I'm liable to freeze solid in my boots. Of course it would be a minor miracle that the Sunday morning paper has even been delivered. I always scoff at television meteorologists who stress "wind chill" data to scare their viewers, but the wind chill for me outside right now is in the 10°F range. The real joke is on me this morning. because I moved my "new" tractor up to the garage in preparation to clear snow this morning. I'm convinced, however, that if I sit on it and drive it outside right now, the next time my carcass will be discovered is in 10,000 years when some scientist cores into the glacier now forming on my driveway pad.
And enough, by the way, of whining by the global warming crowd. Take notice, I'm not going to listen to any such decrepit creatures for a few days, and maybe not until August. I've been suspicious of their sincerity ever since they started talking about "climate change" instead of "global warming" anyway. It is pretty tough to convince me that we're in the midst of global warming when this year's real Spring is over a month behind last year, whatever the calendar may say. I propose here and now that we do away with calendars and equinoxes and go back to "Earth-centric" time. Copernicus was a heretic and a lawyer and his opinions should have been more suspect even in his own time. How about if all gardening folk agree that it's not Spring until the daffodils bloom, wherever you are? Heck, we have time zones whose strict interpretations are enforced by our Federal government, why not "Spring Zones"? They'd just run north and south instead of east to west, so that's no big deal, especially to those gardeners who never know what direction they're facing and plant sunflowers on the north sides of their houses. And for those of you who live in USDA Zones so hot that daffodils don't thrive, who cares when Spring is for you? It's always just Spring or Summer for you. You can say that it's Spring when you can't fry an egg on the sidewalk and Summer when you can. Here in the Flint Hills, ProfessorRoush is not celebrating Spring until he sees a yellow daffodil in his garden! Which is evidently going to be awhile yet.
Enough for statistics. Mark Twain, once said there "are three kinds of lies, lies, damn lies, and statistics." Well, at least most scholars attribute it to Mark Twain; Twain, himself, claimed to be quoting Benjamin Disraeli but the statement cannot be found in Disraeli's private or published works. So the authorship of this quote may be as misleading as are statistics themselves. And anyway, Mark Twain was just a pen name for Samuel Clements; why do we attribute quotes to Mark Twain instead of Samuel Clements? Anyone?
Enough for both Mark Twain and statistics. What the statistics of the daily weather hide is that, as you can plainly see, my little "sun face" on the garage wall looks a little blue at the moment. And that, as you can see in the picture below, part of the ground in my garden is almost clear and other parts have drifts over a foot tall. And that, if I take a step outside the door to pick up the Sunday morning paper, I'm liable to freeze solid in my boots. Of course it would be a minor miracle that the Sunday morning paper has even been delivered. I always scoff at television meteorologists who stress "wind chill" data to scare their viewers, but the wind chill for me outside right now is in the 10°F range. The real joke is on me this morning. because I moved my "new" tractor up to the garage in preparation to clear snow this morning. I'm convinced, however, that if I sit on it and drive it outside right now, the next time my carcass will be discovered is in 10,000 years when some scientist cores into the glacier now forming on my driveway pad.
And enough, by the way, of whining by the global warming crowd. Take notice, I'm not going to listen to any such decrepit creatures for a few days, and maybe not until August. I've been suspicious of their sincerity ever since they started talking about "climate change" instead of "global warming" anyway. It is pretty tough to convince me that we're in the midst of global warming when this year's real Spring is over a month behind last year, whatever the calendar may say. I propose here and now that we do away with calendars and equinoxes and go back to "Earth-centric" time. Copernicus was a heretic and a lawyer and his opinions should have been more suspect even in his own time. How about if all gardening folk agree that it's not Spring until the daffodils bloom, wherever you are? Heck, we have time zones whose strict interpretations are enforced by our Federal government, why not "Spring Zones"? They'd just run north and south instead of east to west, so that's no big deal, especially to those gardeners who never know what direction they're facing and plant sunflowers on the north sides of their houses. And for those of you who live in USDA Zones so hot that daffodils don't thrive, who cares when Spring is for you? It's always just Spring or Summer for you. You can say that it's Spring when you can't fry an egg on the sidewalk and Summer when you can. Here in the Flint Hills, ProfessorRoush is not celebrating Spring until he sees a yellow daffodil in his garden! Which is evidently going to be awhile yet.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Old Plants And Old Landscapes
A marketing email from K. Van Bourgondien with the subject line "Do you know how old YOUR plants are" caught my eye the other day. The email continued with a discussion of antique or heritage flowers available from this large mail order source, but my mind had already tripped down another garden path before I read the body of the email. I was immediately thinking "how old is this or that individual plant in my garden?"
At this point, after thinking about it for awhile, I'm not sure how I would, or should, answer that question. My garden, from when I began to think of it as a garden, began with the construction of the house and is now 14 years old, give or take a month or two. But because I've been adding a bed or two each year to the "garden", some plants are much younger than others. The house landscaping was first, and so there are hollies on the north side of the house that will be 14 years old come this May. The back patio came a year later, and thus 'Madame Hardy' and 'Marie Bugnet' are 13 years old. There are 'New Hampshire Gold' forsythia to the West that are also 13 years old and who are unlikely to get much older because I've tired of them and they are not the showiest varieties available. Farther down the garden, there are plants of every age, right down to the one week old 'Madame Hardy' sucker that I just detached from the original and replanted down into another bed. And there are some garden plants on this land that I planted before it "was" a garden. Several years before building, I planted, and lost, and planted again a few fruit trees down on the western hillside. In a similar fashion, there are asparagus roots in the vegetable garden that date back to 1996.
There are, of course, other ways of looking at plant age. I would argue that an open-pollinated heirloom Sweet Pea, 'Painted Lady', for instance, is only as old as the seed that I saved from last year. Identical as the flowers look, there is still variation in the genetic makeup from vine to vine. But in our current "Era Of The Garden Clones," how old should I really consider my week-old sucker of 'Madame Hardy'? Barely rooted, it is a "division" of my 13 year old, purchased original plant. It is also the same exact living continuation of the rose first introduced in 1832 by Monsieur Hardy himself. That 'Maiden's Blush' in my garden dates back before 1400, before the North American Continent that I live on was known to my forefathers. Many plants, if not most, don't slip into senescence as animals do. Pando, a clonal colony of Quaking Aspen in south-central Utah, is believed to be the oldest living thing on earth at an estimated age of 80,000 years. When the same genes continue year after year, century after century, how old do we say our cloned cultivars are?
And I'm leaving out the plants of the prairie that surround my garden. The Big Bluestem that populates the Flint Hills prairie, and the False Indigo that brighten it, I know that each clump started from individual wind-blown seeds, but how long ago? How long does a clump of drought-resistant Little Bluestem live? Are there grasses on my land that have survived climate changes and prairie fires and tornadoes for thousands of years? Were some of those same grasses grazed by Mammoths? How would I know? How long will my pampered 'Northwind' Panicum clumps survive after me?
I don't know the answers to these questions, and metaphysical subjects are too exhausting right now for this winter-weakened gardener. I'm just going to pretend that my one week old sucker from Madame Hardy is a baby, and I'm going to baby it until it blooms true and strong. And I think that those 'New Hampshire Gold' forsythia are far too old and need to go quietly into that gentle night, helped along by my gardening Dr. Kevorkian look-alike. I'm also going to believe that somewhere out there in the Flint Hills, there is a healthy clump of Big Bluestem which is secure and happy that it no longer gets regularly squashed under the hoof of a Mastodon. Just because it makes me happy to think about it.
At this point, after thinking about it for awhile, I'm not sure how I would, or should, answer that question. My garden, from when I began to think of it as a garden, began with the construction of the house and is now 14 years old, give or take a month or two. But because I've been adding a bed or two each year to the "garden", some plants are much younger than others. The house landscaping was first, and so there are hollies on the north side of the house that will be 14 years old come this May. The back patio came a year later, and thus 'Madame Hardy' and 'Marie Bugnet' are 13 years old. There are 'New Hampshire Gold' forsythia to the West that are also 13 years old and who are unlikely to get much older because I've tired of them and they are not the showiest varieties available. Farther down the garden, there are plants of every age, right down to the one week old 'Madame Hardy' sucker that I just detached from the original and replanted down into another bed. And there are some garden plants on this land that I planted before it "was" a garden. Several years before building, I planted, and lost, and planted again a few fruit trees down on the western hillside. In a similar fashion, there are asparagus roots in the vegetable garden that date back to 1996.
There are, of course, other ways of looking at plant age. I would argue that an open-pollinated heirloom Sweet Pea, 'Painted Lady', for instance, is only as old as the seed that I saved from last year. Identical as the flowers look, there is still variation in the genetic makeup from vine to vine. But in our current "Era Of The Garden Clones," how old should I really consider my week-old sucker of 'Madame Hardy'? Barely rooted, it is a "division" of my 13 year old, purchased original plant. It is also the same exact living continuation of the rose first introduced in 1832 by Monsieur Hardy himself. That 'Maiden's Blush' in my garden dates back before 1400, before the North American Continent that I live on was known to my forefathers. Many plants, if not most, don't slip into senescence as animals do. Pando, a clonal colony of Quaking Aspen in south-central Utah, is believed to be the oldest living thing on earth at an estimated age of 80,000 years. When the same genes continue year after year, century after century, how old do we say our cloned cultivars are?
And I'm leaving out the plants of the prairie that surround my garden. The Big Bluestem that populates the Flint Hills prairie, and the False Indigo that brighten it, I know that each clump started from individual wind-blown seeds, but how long ago? How long does a clump of drought-resistant Little Bluestem live? Are there grasses on my land that have survived climate changes and prairie fires and tornadoes for thousands of years? Were some of those same grasses grazed by Mammoths? How would I know? How long will my pampered 'Northwind' Panicum clumps survive after me?
I don't know the answers to these questions, and metaphysical subjects are too exhausting right now for this winter-weakened gardener. I'm just going to pretend that my one week old sucker from Madame Hardy is a baby, and I'm going to baby it until it blooms true and strong. And I think that those 'New Hampshire Gold' forsythia are far too old and need to go quietly into that gentle night, helped along by my gardening Dr. Kevorkian look-alike. I'm also going to believe that somewhere out there in the Flint Hills, there is a healthy clump of Big Bluestem which is secure and happy that it no longer gets regularly squashed under the hoof of a Mastodon. Just because it makes me happy to think about it.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
An-ti-ci-pa-tion
Scilla siberica |
"We can never know about the days to come
But we think about them anyway
And I wonder if I'm really with you now
Or just chasing after some finer day."
But we think about them anyway
And I wonder if I'm really with you now
Or just chasing after some finer day."
Rose 'American Pillar' |
Is that not a perfect description of the gardener's thoughts in late Winter? Visualizing the garden, not brown and stiff and dreary here at the end of Cold Days, but green and glorious in the coming Summer? When I walked through my garden today, I wasn't really there most of the time. I wasn't really talking to those naked rose canes, nor were my finger's caressing the soft bud of that magnolia. I saw only the rose that will bloom here tomorrow, only the sweet-perfumed magnolia that will soon welcome the warm rains.
'Mohawk' viburnum |
"Anticipation, anticipation
Is making me late
Is keeping me waiting"
Sedum 'Matrona' |
Why, Scilla siberica, are you keeping me waiting? It's time to open those pale blue buds and color the old gray mulch with the reflection of the sky. Come on, Viburnum fragrans 'Mohawk', come blow me away yet another year with that otherworldly sweet fragrance. Daffodils, bring forth the sunshine that hides in your heart and release Spring with your joyful trumpets!
Sometimes, I wonder that old gardeners bother to enter their gardens at all during the dark months. I know, right now, the glorious tulip that will bloom in this spot. I know that from these tiny thick green leaves, a magnificent Sedum 'Matrona' will bloom to close the door on the Fall garden. I know...I know...and yet I must see it again. Or, as Carly put it:
"And tomorrow we might not be together
I'm no prophet, Lord I don't know nature's way
So I'll try to see into your eyes right now
And stay right here, 'cause these are the good old days."
Thank you, Ms. Simon. These are indeed the good old days.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)