In my garden, after all these years, I'm reasonably sure that 99% of what lives there won't kill me. It took ProfessorRoush all these years of jumping at the first sight of a slithering serpent or running madly away from the minuscule movements of a measly mouse to finally cultivate calmness in the face of garden calamity. Mrs. ProfessorRoush thinks I have lost my fear of snakes entirely, but in truth, although I still react with the instincts of a chimpanzee and want to scream and throw feces at them, I have simply restrained my response to reaching a safe distance in a reasonable period of time rather than at full panicked gallop.
Thus it was that this morning, while picking strawberries on my hands and knees, I didn't react at all when there was a rustling beneath the strawberry leaves and movement a few inches away from my hand. I didn't, in fact, even move my hand away. I had just picked strawberries from all over the area in question, so I figured that if it was finally time to encounter a scared and biting copperhead, it was just my turn. In actuality it was something else entirely. Can you find it in the picture at the upper right?
How about this one? Can you make out the tiny furry ear in the center of the picture at left? Both the diminutive creature at the center of the first picture and the non-moving ear in the second are a pair of baby rabbits who were concealed in a small depression in the center of my strawberry patch. I imagine Mama Rabbit must have thought, "what a great place to put my babies, here in all this foliage where no one can find them. And only 20 feet from a few nice rows of peas and garden bean seedlings" Which also explains what happened to a row of my just-sprouted peas that disappeared one night last week.
Well, as much as I have plans to kill or trap the several adult rabbits that are eating my hosta and small shrubs presently around the house, I'll just leave these two babies alone. They aren't bothering the strawberries (as evidenced by my harvest today, pictured at the right), and they already lost their best chance at causing me a heart attack, so they can stay. At least until next year when they're fully grown and eating the baby roses and asian lilies.
Though an old gardener, I am but a young blogger. The humor and added alliteration are free.
Showing posts with label snake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label snake. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Snake Ninja
Well, that respite didn't last long. My winters in this Kansas garden seem long and harsh, but I number among my few blessings that the winters here are also relatively snake-free. I say relatively because there is always the chance that lifting a rock might expose a hibernating little milk snake. I actually saw my first snake this year, a small foot-long, pencil-thick, rat snake, about a month ago when I picked up a bag of mulch that had been lying in the yard in the sun for a week. That one was pretty sluggish on the still-cold ground, although I presume it had taken shelter under the bag because the plastic-bagged mulch was warmed by the sun and beginning to compost.
Two weeks ago, however, I spotted this rather large common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) stretching out in the open grass while I was out with Bella. It was interesting that my nose-driven, curious and crazy dog did not notice this snake at all, dancing oblivious within several feet of it before I called her away. Can dogs not detect the scent of snake? I've seen Bella follow the exact track of another dog through our yard more than a half hour after the dog ran through it. But she can't smell a snake several feet away?
If you've read this blog for any long period, you know of my snake phobia. I hate them, but since I hate rodents more, I don't kill the snakes. Well at least not the non-poisonous ones and I have yet to run across a poisonous snake in my yard, although I'm sure there are plenty of Copperheads and Rattlesnakes in the vicinity. Thankfully for my mental stability, I most often find either rat snakes or these pretty orange-black-yellow Common Garters. This guy is likely an old one. Wikipedia lists their maximum length as around 54 inches and although he didn't stand still for measurement, he was at least 48 inches nose to tail. Based on my reading, he may be a Kansas record, but now I'll never know.
As I've noted before, frequent noxious exposure has conditioned me to moderate my response to the sight of a snake and I was calm and collected as I spotted the snake and got the clear picture above. As I went in for a closer shot of the head, however, the snake moved with ninja-like reptilian swiftness and I found myself looking at a coiled, ready to strike, four foot long snake from about 2 feet away. Mildly startled, I produced this moderately blurry image from an elevated position of spontaneous levitation. The snake was not moving, but I certainly was. Or perhaps the image is just blurred from my heart rate, which went from 60 to 200 faster than an Indy 500 race car. My primitive brainstem doesn't seem to care that my highly evolved human cerebral cortex knows this snake is nonpoisonous.
Discretion being the better part of valor, I chose at that point to stand still and watch from about 10 feet away while the snake uncoiled and swiftly slithered across the yard and disappeared into the irises, leaving me panting, and at the same time, a little sad. I had great hopes for the irises this year, but now they'll just have to survive summer as best they can on their own.
If you've read this blog for any long period, you know of my snake phobia. I hate them, but since I hate rodents more, I don't kill the snakes. Well at least not the non-poisonous ones and I have yet to run across a poisonous snake in my yard, although I'm sure there are plenty of Copperheads and Rattlesnakes in the vicinity. Thankfully for my mental stability, I most often find either rat snakes or these pretty orange-black-yellow Common Garters. This guy is likely an old one. Wikipedia lists their maximum length as around 54 inches and although he didn't stand still for measurement, he was at least 48 inches nose to tail. Based on my reading, he may be a Kansas record, but now I'll never know.
As I've noted before, frequent noxious exposure has conditioned me to moderate my response to the sight of a snake and I was calm and collected as I spotted the snake and got the clear picture above. As I went in for a closer shot of the head, however, the snake moved with ninja-like reptilian swiftness and I found myself looking at a coiled, ready to strike, four foot long snake from about 2 feet away. Mildly startled, I produced this moderately blurry image from an elevated position of spontaneous levitation. The snake was not moving, but I certainly was. Or perhaps the image is just blurred from my heart rate, which went from 60 to 200 faster than an Indy 500 race car. My primitive brainstem doesn't seem to care that my highly evolved human cerebral cortex knows this snake is nonpoisonous.
Discretion being the better part of valor, I chose at that point to stand still and watch from about 10 feet away while the snake uncoiled and swiftly slithered across the yard and disappeared into the irises, leaving me panting, and at the same time, a little sad. I had great hopes for the irises this year, but now they'll just have to survive summer as best they can on their own.
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Snakes, Rats, Rain, and Thunder
Mindful of President Bush's somewhat premature declaration of victory in Iraq over a decade back, I'm not ready to declare victory against the pack rats, but I'm winning. My current casualty count is up to eight pack rats with the addition of a nice plump peanut-butter loving rodent this morning.
However, during my disposal of said carcass from the battlefield, I glanced down to find this quite docile little cutie trying to hide next to the rocks. There's no size scale to the picture below, so you probably can't tell that he was only about a foot long . If he was contemplating swallowing the nearby pack rat carcass whole, then I'll give him credit for courage because that would be quite a feat for a pencil-thin snake.
This is a ringneck snake (Diadophis punctatus), probably a southern ringneck (D. p. punctatus). It lives almost everywhere in the United States, but is nocturnal and seldom seen because it spends most of it's time hidden under rocks, logs, or debris during the day. I've seen exactly three in my lifetime. This one, another little 4 inch long baby that was under a stepping stone that I moved last week, and the third, another small one seen about 8 years back when I lifted a stone. Are my two recent sightings a coincidence or a sign of increasing population density? Gracious, perhaps it was caused by global warming!
In Kansas, a long-term mark-recapture study of snakes was performed by naturalist Henry Sheldon Fitch (1909-2009), the former Superintendent of the University of Kansas Natural History Reservation. Professor Fitch estimated that ringneck snakes commonly exist at densities greater than 700-1800 per hectare (2.47 acres) in this area, suggesting that on my 20 acres there are likely over 6000 of these little guys slithering around. Thank God that I'm no longer scared of snakes, partially desensitized after a zillion encounters with them here on the prairie. Ringneck snakes are both predator and prey in this ecosystem, and mildly venomous due the presence of a Duvernoy's gland behind their eye, but of no danger to humans. They eat earthworms, slugs, amphibians, lizards, and other small snakes during their nightly forages. If you want to know more about how many snakes are likely living in my backyard, you can read Professor Fitch's paper, Population Structure and Biomass of Some Common Snakes in Central North America online at the Biodiversity Heritage Library. Just don't tell me about it because I'm probably better off if I don't know the actual numbers of other snake species around me.
I wish now that I would have reached down and given this little guy a nudge (with a stick of course), because the dull brown top of his body hides a beautiful yellow underbelly that they expose when touched. On second thought, however, maybe I'll just keep from forming a habit of poking snakes. With 6000 of them around, you never know what they might dream up together as a form of revenge.
One final thought; the drought seems to be ending here today. At noon today we had a year-to-date total of 5 inches of rain, with a deficit-to-date of 2.95 inches. But it rained buckets all afternoon and the local news at 9:00 said an official total of 3.65 inches fell today in Manhattan and it is still raining tonight. Even better, there are chances of rain (good chances!) for 6 of the next 7 days. It will take about that much to refill the groundwater reservoirs here, so you won't hear me complaining until the day I need to start building an ark; or until the pack rats and snakes float into the house, whichever comes first.
However, during my disposal of said carcass from the battlefield, I glanced down to find this quite docile little cutie trying to hide next to the rocks. There's no size scale to the picture below, so you probably can't tell that he was only about a foot long . If he was contemplating swallowing the nearby pack rat carcass whole, then I'll give him credit for courage because that would be quite a feat for a pencil-thin snake.
This is a ringneck snake (Diadophis punctatus), probably a southern ringneck (D. p. punctatus). It lives almost everywhere in the United States, but is nocturnal and seldom seen because it spends most of it's time hidden under rocks, logs, or debris during the day. I've seen exactly three in my lifetime. This one, another little 4 inch long baby that was under a stepping stone that I moved last week, and the third, another small one seen about 8 years back when I lifted a stone. Are my two recent sightings a coincidence or a sign of increasing population density? Gracious, perhaps it was caused by global warming!
In Kansas, a long-term mark-recapture study of snakes was performed by naturalist Henry Sheldon Fitch (1909-2009), the former Superintendent of the University of Kansas Natural History Reservation. Professor Fitch estimated that ringneck snakes commonly exist at densities greater than 700-1800 per hectare (2.47 acres) in this area, suggesting that on my 20 acres there are likely over 6000 of these little guys slithering around. Thank God that I'm no longer scared of snakes, partially desensitized after a zillion encounters with them here on the prairie. Ringneck snakes are both predator and prey in this ecosystem, and mildly venomous due the presence of a Duvernoy's gland behind their eye, but of no danger to humans. They eat earthworms, slugs, amphibians, lizards, and other small snakes during their nightly forages. If you want to know more about how many snakes are likely living in my backyard, you can read Professor Fitch's paper, Population Structure and Biomass of Some Common Snakes in Central North America online at the Biodiversity Heritage Library. Just don't tell me about it because I'm probably better off if I don't know the actual numbers of other snake species around me.
I wish now that I would have reached down and given this little guy a nudge (with a stick of course), because the dull brown top of his body hides a beautiful yellow underbelly that they expose when touched. On second thought, however, maybe I'll just keep from forming a habit of poking snakes. With 6000 of them around, you never know what they might dream up together as a form of revenge.
One final thought; the drought seems to be ending here today. At noon today we had a year-to-date total of 5 inches of rain, with a deficit-to-date of 2.95 inches. But it rained buckets all afternoon and the local news at 9:00 said an official total of 3.65 inches fell today in Manhattan and it is still raining tonight. Even better, there are chances of rain (good chances!) for 6 of the next 7 days. It will take about that much to refill the groundwater reservoirs here, so you won't hear me complaining until the day I need to start building an ark; or until the pack rats and snakes float into the house, whichever comes first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)