Another mystery of my garden was revealed last night when a volunteer peony seedling (sapling? stalk? plant?) opened for the first time. Until I first noticed this little gem in 2012, growing where it shouldn't be, I was unaware that some peonies would self-seed if they weren't deadheaded. There were 6 or 8 ancient peonies near the orchard where I was raised, and I never noticed any distant seedlings, but perhaps that was because we mowed around each peony and never gave them a chance. In contrast, my cypress-mulched and partially shaded front garden must be perfect for peony babies, because I've now got three small new peonies where none was planted.
My natural approach of live-and-let-live for self-seeding plants paid off perfectly this time. This little girl is presumably a self-cross of 'Kansas' or 'Inspector Lavergne', or a cross of the two, since there are several of each in the bed. Regardless of the parentage, I'm pleased at the almost bright-red coloration, the prominent yellow stamens, and the semi-double form, and I think I'll keep this one around under an appropriate study name such as 'Roush's Red'. The blue foliage at the top of the picture, if you're wondering, is a blue-green sedum, 'Strawberries and Cream'.
If you recognize the foliage of a volunteer plant, and it isn't a weed, don't pull it up. You just never know the gifts you've been given until you, in turn, give them a chance to shine.
Though an old gardener, I am but a young blogger. The humor and added alliteration are free.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Predictable Poser
ProfessorRoush has spent the last 3 years puzzling over the provenance of a perfect little rose seedling that I found in the shade of 'Hope for Humanity' late one summer. Praying that I had a new little self-seeded hybrid of my very own, I transplanted it to a new bed where it would get plenty of sun and I waited for it to bloom.
At the end of a full growing season, in 2012, the rose was about 12 inches tall, and still perfectly healthy, but it did not bloom. It was obviously winter-hardy and had no blackspot. It had small foliage of 7 leaflets that roughly resembled a R. spinosissima, but the only two R. spinosissima hybrids I've ever grown were 'Harison's Yellow' and 'Stanwell Perpetual'. 'Stanwell Perpetual' had been grown near the birthing site about 6 years ago, but was long dead. Could this rose be from a surviving root of that rose? If it was, then why wasn't it blooming?
I waited another year, believing that even a non-remonant rose would bloom at the start of the 2013 season, but the plant still didn't bloom. By that time, my theory was that I had a seedling of R. arkansana, the wild rose of the local prairies, and I was kicking myself for thinking it could be anything else. But R. arkansana's foliage in the nearby prairie looked bigger than my rose, and by the end of last season, the rose was 3 feet tall, with long canes and small short prickles everywhere. Thankfully, it was still completely free of blackspot. But what was it?
This week, the mystery was solved for me. The rose has been blooming with these little pink single-flowered blossoms. I looked at them, looked over my shoulder at the R. eglanteria (R. rubiginosa) growing in another bed, and I confirmed the identity of my seedling as R. rubiginosa by rubbing a few leaves and releasing that nice green apple scent. Somehow, (a bird?) Shakespeare's Sweetbriar rose had seeded itself 200 feet away from the bed in which it grew.
I suppose it could still be a hybrid, but I can't tell my rose from the species at present. We'll confirm it again when hips form. Mystery solved, but do I really want another monstrous R. eglanteria near a pathway and short of room? I think not. It'll have to be moved.
At the end of a full growing season, in 2012, the rose was about 12 inches tall, and still perfectly healthy, but it did not bloom. It was obviously winter-hardy and had no blackspot. It had small foliage of 7 leaflets that roughly resembled a R. spinosissima, but the only two R. spinosissima hybrids I've ever grown were 'Harison's Yellow' and 'Stanwell Perpetual'. 'Stanwell Perpetual' had been grown near the birthing site about 6 years ago, but was long dead. Could this rose be from a surviving root of that rose? If it was, then why wasn't it blooming?
I waited another year, believing that even a non-remonant rose would bloom at the start of the 2013 season, but the plant still didn't bloom. By that time, my theory was that I had a seedling of R. arkansana, the wild rose of the local prairies, and I was kicking myself for thinking it could be anything else. But R. arkansana's foliage in the nearby prairie looked bigger than my rose, and by the end of last season, the rose was 3 feet tall, with long canes and small short prickles everywhere. Thankfully, it was still completely free of blackspot. But what was it?
This week, the mystery was solved for me. The rose has been blooming with these little pink single-flowered blossoms. I looked at them, looked over my shoulder at the R. eglanteria (R. rubiginosa) growing in another bed, and I confirmed the identity of my seedling as R. rubiginosa by rubbing a few leaves and releasing that nice green apple scent. Somehow, (a bird?) Shakespeare's Sweetbriar rose had seeded itself 200 feet away from the bed in which it grew.
I suppose it could still be a hybrid, but I can't tell my rose from the species at present. We'll confirm it again when hips form. Mystery solved, but do I really want another monstrous R. eglanteria near a pathway and short of room? I think not. It'll have to be moved.
Monday, May 19, 2014
New Roses, Bright Future
'South Africa' |
It's nice when own-root, new roses are already blooming as they arrive, and I was especially excited to see these blooms from 'South Africa', a W. Kordes & Sons floribunda introduced in 2001. Although the spectacular color of this rose is not in question, everything else about it seems to be up in the air. The British label it a Floribunda, the American Rose Society calls it a Grandiflora, and it is introduced in South Africa as a Hybrid Tea. It was introduced by Kordes as 'Golden Beauty', and also carries the registration name of KORberbeni, but I've found other references that say that Kordes et alnever registered the rose. It won the Gold Standard Rose Trials Gold Standard award in Britain in 2009, and the Golden Price of the City of Glasgow in 2006, so it has a pretty decent following across the pond.
For the life of me, I can't find anything about why the rose is marketed as 'South Africa' here. 'Golden Beauty' seems intuitive, but there is no explanation that I can find for renaming it as 'South Africa'. The Kordes & Sons website doesn't even list the rose anymore, on either the German or English versions of the site, and that seems a little odd too. So, if anyone knows more, please enlighten me.
In the meantime, I've got this one and eight more roses from www.rosesunlimitedownroot.com to plant tonight. Of the remaining, all are Griffith Buck roses except for 'Edith de Murat', an 1858-era Bourbon. I couldn't resist another sweet-scented Bourbon.
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Wanton Whimsy
Gardeners one and all, please forgive me for the crass display you are witnessing. I took a long step this past week beyond acceptable garden ornamentation, crashing and burning far past the gates of conventional decorum. I created, in my unsuspecting garden, as you can plainly see here, a bottle tree.
I've lusted for a bottle tree for years and I still can't explain the urge. It's like I am a Babtist preacher who keeps coming back to Mardi Gras. I normally strive to maintain a garden that the general public will likely approve of, even as I push back against pruning conventions to the irritation of those who like their shrubbery carefully clipped and marching in step. The existence of a bottle tree in my garden is a leap far past the line of whimsy for me, a singular incongruity like a wart on a princess. I've flirted with whimsy before, bringing yet another rabbit statue into the garden, but until now I've stayed on the safe side, refusing to add figures of gargoyles and peeing little boys.
There are commercial bottle trees available, even an entire company dedicated to their creation, but I had to make my own. For one thing, I felt the commercial trees were too small, usually under 5 feet tall and seldom holding over twenty bottles. And they're pricey. And I was worried about anchorage against the Kansas winds. A bottle tree that has to be straightened after every storm would be exhausting. So I created my own, cementing a treated landscape post into the ground so the trunk would be over 6 feet tall. I cut rebar for use as "limbs". Best of all, I can add to it merely by drilling a hole and adding another limb. I want lots and lots of bottles.
The King of Bottle Trees, Felder Rushing, who himself has fourteen of them, believes that bottle trees date as far back as men have made glass, from back when the belief arose that spirits could live in bottles and that evil spirits could be captured in them. Rushing also relates, and I agree, that blue-only bottle trees are the best. Doubt me? Click here to be convinced by a picture of Rushing's blue tree covered in snow. Mine would be all cobalt blue already, but Mrs. ProfessorRoush and her friends insist on choosing wine for its taste instead of the pretty bottle it comes in. Consequently, I have only one blue bottle at the moment, but the Internet may come to the rescue since I can buy a dozen cobalt blue bottles there for a mere $19.99. I think making an all blue tree will really spruce up the bottle tree and my garden.
(Get it? "Spruce up my bottle tree?")
I've lusted for a bottle tree for years and I still can't explain the urge. It's like I am a Babtist preacher who keeps coming back to Mardi Gras. I normally strive to maintain a garden that the general public will likely approve of, even as I push back against pruning conventions to the irritation of those who like their shrubbery carefully clipped and marching in step. The existence of a bottle tree in my garden is a leap far past the line of whimsy for me, a singular incongruity like a wart on a princess. I've flirted with whimsy before, bringing yet another rabbit statue into the garden, but until now I've stayed on the safe side, refusing to add figures of gargoyles and peeing little boys.
There are commercial bottle trees available, even an entire company dedicated to their creation, but I had to make my own. For one thing, I felt the commercial trees were too small, usually under 5 feet tall and seldom holding over twenty bottles. And they're pricey. And I was worried about anchorage against the Kansas winds. A bottle tree that has to be straightened after every storm would be exhausting. So I created my own, cementing a treated landscape post into the ground so the trunk would be over 6 feet tall. I cut rebar for use as "limbs". Best of all, I can add to it merely by drilling a hole and adding another limb. I want lots and lots of bottles.
The King of Bottle Trees, Felder Rushing, who himself has fourteen of them, believes that bottle trees date as far back as men have made glass, from back when the belief arose that spirits could live in bottles and that evil spirits could be captured in them. Rushing also relates, and I agree, that blue-only bottle trees are the best. Doubt me? Click here to be convinced by a picture of Rushing's blue tree covered in snow. Mine would be all cobalt blue already, but Mrs. ProfessorRoush and her friends insist on choosing wine for its taste instead of the pretty bottle it comes in. Consequently, I have only one blue bottle at the moment, but the Internet may come to the rescue since I can buy a dozen cobalt blue bottles there for a mere $19.99. I think making an all blue tree will really spruce up the bottle tree and my garden.
(Get it? "Spruce up my bottle tree?")
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)