![]() |
'Chuckles' |
I believed for the longest time, right up until I began to research the rose for this blog entry, that Chuckles was a Griffith Buck-bred rose. But it isn't a Griffith Buck rose, 'Chuckles' was, according to www.helpmefind.com, bred by Roy Shepherd in 1958. How did I get it so wrong? In this case, there is a perfectly simple explanation. I swear that I'm innocent, Your Honor. I purchased my 'Chuckles' from www.heirloomroses.com, where it is listed as a Griffith Buck rose. It is not, however, listed as a Buck rose on Iowa State University's website or anyplace else. Heirloom just has it wrong. 'Chuckles' was bred from a seed parent cross between 'Jean Lafitte' and 'New Dawn', and the pollen parent was 'Orange Triumph'.
She's also not a shrub rose, as I previously thought, she is classified as a Floribunda. I can see that now, the profuse bloom and intense garden presence of the bush. 'Chuckles' is a continuous bloomer in my garden, rarely without a few eye-catching blossoms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0859/f08592df289c03f177e1cfb21f8d22ba9035c51e" alt="".jpg)
Most importantly of all, 'Chuckles' is one of the most aptly named roses of rosedom. Anyone in her presence can't help but be cheered up by a single look of those bountiful bright pink and white blooms. If I were to design a garden for a depressed friend, 'Chuckles' would be a necessity. Heck, all of us could use one or two 'Chuckles' in the garden to cheer us up from time to time.