Woeful, she waits.
Outside, her love, ceaselessly puttering.
A glimpse she sees, then gone again,
A wisp, a phantom, endlessly muttering.
Moving through chores as hours march on.
Spraying his poisons into the air,
Pumping and misting with no time to spare.
Fretful, she waits.
Sadly, she waits.
Outside, blue sky and green grass beckon.
Scents, they abound, echos of sound,
Roll across hills and over horizon.
Breezes carry the fury of life.
Sunlight blesses the restless soil,
Earthworms squiggle in endless toil.
Fitful, she waits.
Doleful, she waits.
Outside, out there, is her friend and her love.
Lost to the world, intent and tired,
Her father, her playmate, her gardening other.
Inside she barks as her patience wears thin.
A world to explore, a garden to smell,
A drama to track and a story to tell.
Forlorn, she waits.
At last the door opens.
So joyful is she.
A wag of the tail,
And a few licks for me.
Then out she bounds to the world that awaits.
So happy, she laughs as she dances and shivers,
Short legs are pumping, whiskers aquiver.
Bella, my dog.
Mrs. ProfessorRoush took this photo last Sunday while I was spraying to keep the bagworms out of the evergreens and the worms out of the cherries. Mrs. ProfessorRoush hates worms in the cherries, and as much as I hate insecticides, I surrendered my garden ethics quickly in the face of spousal demand and potential withdrawal of affections. Meanwhile Bella has become my steadfast garden companion over the past month of warmer weather and has become extremely attached to me when I'm home. She's headstrong (I'm referring to Bella right now) and I was afraid she would run away after the first bird or car that appeared, but I slowly trained her to stay within my sight and she is now allowed off leash in the garden while I work. Bella didn't understand why she couldn't join me within the haze of poison spray this weekend, however. Nothing looks more dismayed than a beagle separated from the outdoors and her love.
p.s.: and, yes, "aquiver" is a real word.
Though an old gardener, I am but a young blogger. The humor and added alliteration are free.
Friday, May 22, 2015
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Lilliputian Garden Drama
Just a few evenings ago, ProfessorRoush was madly capturing a few photos with his Nikon, plausibly preserving images of about 30 rose blooms for such purposes as posterity, public lectures, or potential future blog entries. In full disclosure, however, he was just taking pictures of pretty flowers and enjoying the moment.
As he labeled each photo later, however, he noticed that a number of the blooms had insects or arachnids on them. As an example, he noticed this tiny spider on shockingly pink 'Duchess of Portland':
For another example, ProfessorRoush had taken this photo of 'Souvenir du President Lincoln' at 6:27 p.m. See the wee spider at the lower left of the bloom?
Here he is closeup:
Talk about your itsy-bitsy spiders!
By accident, and with no particular purpose in mind besides flitting madly from flower to flower like a honey bee on fast forward, ProfessorRoush randomly wandered later past the same 'Souvenir du President Lincoln' blossom and took another photograph at almost the same angle. This one was taken at 6:44 p.m. Look again at Mr. Spider on the lower left of the bloom.
He doesn't seem to have moved very far, but he appears a little less distinct, doesn't he? In closeup, you can now discern that he has captured a tiny green insect, one that I would naively call a "leafhopper" but I don't really know the genus.
Whatever the identity of this spider and insect, these photos pretty much sum up the microscopic war hidden within our gardens, don't they? We lumbering apes think it's just all about color and growth and sex, but we too seldom get a glimpse beyond the veil like this one. There are likely lots of lessons lurking in this unfolded drama, but ProfessorRoush has gained yet more evidence that a garden can ably manage to protect itself in the absence of synthetic insecticides.
If we could please keep this between us, however, I'd appreciate it. Some of these roses come inside, hitchhikers and all, and Mrs. ProfessorRoush takes a dim view of even the most microscopic spiders on her kitchen countertops.
As he labeled each photo later, however, he noticed that a number of the blooms had insects or arachnids on them. As an example, he noticed this tiny spider on shockingly pink 'Duchess of Portland':
For another example, ProfessorRoush had taken this photo of 'Souvenir du President Lincoln' at 6:27 p.m. See the wee spider at the lower left of the bloom?
Here he is closeup:
Talk about your itsy-bitsy spiders!
By accident, and with no particular purpose in mind besides flitting madly from flower to flower like a honey bee on fast forward, ProfessorRoush randomly wandered later past the same 'Souvenir du President Lincoln' blossom and took another photograph at almost the same angle. This one was taken at 6:44 p.m. Look again at Mr. Spider on the lower left of the bloom.
He doesn't seem to have moved very far, but he appears a little less distinct, doesn't he? In closeup, you can now discern that he has captured a tiny green insect, one that I would naively call a "leafhopper" but I don't really know the genus.
Whatever the identity of this spider and insect, these photos pretty much sum up the microscopic war hidden within our gardens, don't they? We lumbering apes think it's just all about color and growth and sex, but we too seldom get a glimpse beyond the veil like this one. There are likely lots of lessons lurking in this unfolded drama, but ProfessorRoush has gained yet more evidence that a garden can ably manage to protect itself in the absence of synthetic insecticides.
If we could please keep this between us, however, I'd appreciate it. Some of these roses come inside, hitchhikers and all, and Mrs. ProfessorRoush takes a dim view of even the most microscopic spiders on her kitchen countertops.
Monday, May 18, 2015
Violet Veilchenblau
My first 'Veilchenblau' bloom |
One of my Zonal Denial efforts last year was to once more obtain and plant, and to overwinter for the first time, 'Veilchenblau', a Hybrid Multiflora rambler-form rose that was introduced by Johann Schmidt of Germany in 1909. I first glimpsed 'Veilchenblau' at Wave Hill in 2008, where she was in full bloom on June 18th. I included her the following year as a "bonus" rose in an order of own-root rose bands, but the rose I received had one root in the grave when it came and died almost immediately after planting in the hot Kansas sun. Fortunately, good sense took hold as I read about her habits and hardiness, and I put aside my budding infatuation for 'Veilchenblau' and resolved not to try again. Last year, however, when I ordered 'Red Intuition' and needed to choose a minimum of three roses to complete the order, I saw her name in the catalog and filled her name in on my team roster. She may have been chosen last, but I put her in my starting lineup and I've told her to not be a shrinking violet.
'Veilchenblau' at Wave Hill, June, 2008 |
In Empress of the Garden, by G. Michael Shoup, 'Veilchenblau' is listed in a section called "The Elegant Climbers", and Shoup writes "A must for the garden, 'Veilchenblau' rarely suckers or spreads by seed. Easy to train and graceful, she blends peacefully into landscapes...her cooling colors settle softly over her foliage like a translucent fog..." She? Her? It is comforting for me to see that even the experts attach gender to individual roses and therefore it may not a sign that I'm missing a marble or four. Either that, or at least I might have an interesting cell-mate (Shoup) after they come and lock me away. If you are in the mood for a more gender-neutral but engaging discussion of 'Veilchenblau', read Mac Grisold's essay on her in Roses; A Celebration, edited by Wayne Winterrowd. Mac calls 'Veilchenblau' her favorite rose, and "beautiful and vulgar," "indecently purple," and "outrageous", but still manages to keep "it" a genderless friend. Who's fooling who?
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Serendipitous Apricot
I was delighted, while walking the mad dog Bella on my evening rounds, to see this bloom of 'Serendipity' standing up tall and begging to be noticed. I grow few roses that develop a classic high-centered Hybrid-Tea form, but this demure gal is clearly one of them. Perfect enough for a Victorian, perfect enough for me!
'Serendipity' is a 4 foot tall Shrub rose that is considered to be a Hybrid Tea by some sources. I understand the confusion now that I've seen her high-centered, double bloom. Blooms are large (4-4.5 inches) and mostly one to a stem but she also occasionally clusters. She was introduced by Dr. Griffith Buck in 1978. Her official color is given on the Iowa State Buck Rose website as "Mars Orange (RHSCC 31 C) over a buttercup yellow (RHSCC 1 6C) base and becoming pale Orient pink (RHSCC 36B) with age." Translation: she's mostly apricot and she pales to pink. I would add that she has more pink tones than orange when she develops in cooler temperatures.
She's been in my garden for two years and she has held her own against the climate, although I wouldn't describe her as vigorous, and she certainly wasn't cane hardy this past winter, growing back from about 6 inches high this spring. In the garden, I would have said last year that the blooms open rapidly in one or two days to a loosely arranged cupped form, but here in the house she has maintained that high-center bud form for 4 days. To my nose, she has a moderate to strong, very sweet fragrance. Some describe her as apple-scented, but I don't. No blackspot on this one, over the past two seasons. One nursery states that this rose was previously sold as Mango Blush, a found rose, with a mild fragrance and some repeat. I don't know if Mango Blush is actually 'Serendipity,' because I think the fragrance is stronger than described and I think 'Serendipity' reblooms more consistently than "some repeat."
'Serendipity' may not be my first choice of a Griffith Buck rose to grow, but she's not a terrible rose either, and she has a great Hybrid Tea form for cutting. I'd tell you that her apricot color is unmatched, but I know better because there are several Griffith Buck roses with better orangey tones. 'Serendipity' is said to be a cross of two seedlings; (Western Sun × Carefree Beauty) X (Apricot Nectar × Prairie Princess).
'Serendipity' is a 4 foot tall Shrub rose that is considered to be a Hybrid Tea by some sources. I understand the confusion now that I've seen her high-centered, double bloom. Blooms are large (4-4.5 inches) and mostly one to a stem but she also occasionally clusters. She was introduced by Dr. Griffith Buck in 1978. Her official color is given on the Iowa State Buck Rose website as "Mars Orange (RHSCC 31 C) over a buttercup yellow (RHSCC 1 6C) base and becoming pale Orient pink (RHSCC 36B) with age." Translation: she's mostly apricot and she pales to pink. I would add that she has more pink tones than orange when she develops in cooler temperatures.
She's been in my garden for two years and she has held her own against the climate, although I wouldn't describe her as vigorous, and she certainly wasn't cane hardy this past winter, growing back from about 6 inches high this spring. In the garden, I would have said last year that the blooms open rapidly in one or two days to a loosely arranged cupped form, but here in the house she has maintained that high-center bud form for 4 days. To my nose, she has a moderate to strong, very sweet fragrance. Some describe her as apple-scented, but I don't. No blackspot on this one, over the past two seasons. One nursery states that this rose was previously sold as Mango Blush, a found rose, with a mild fragrance and some repeat. I don't know if Mango Blush is actually 'Serendipity,' because I think the fragrance is stronger than described and I think 'Serendipity' reblooms more consistently than "some repeat."
'Serendipity' may not be my first choice of a Griffith Buck rose to grow, but she's not a terrible rose either, and she has a great Hybrid Tea form for cutting. I'd tell you that her apricot color is unmatched, but I know better because there are several Griffith Buck roses with better orangey tones. 'Serendipity' is said to be a cross of two seedlings; (Western Sun × Carefree Beauty) X (Apricot Nectar × Prairie Princess).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)