I suppose that I should have expected it, should have foreseen the horrors. Once 'Knock Out' became ubiquitous in the suburban landscape of America and moved beyond usefulness to cliché, I should have known that this paradigm-changing rose was inevitably destined to be even more misused, abused, and perverted; to ultimately be used in manners so hideous as to defy the imagination of gardeners born with a vestige of good taste.
I was still shocked, however, to stumble across the mutilated specimens shown here, these professionally scalped and shaped green rectangles and balls that I fleetingly mistook at first glance for privet or yews. These, my friends, are not evergreens, yews, privet, or box. I was horrified to realize that these monstrosities were 'Knock Out' roses, identifiable by the sparse murky red blooms visible at the back of the rectangular-shaped specimen. For a fleeting moment that recognition caused me to reach for my eyes in a fruitless effort to gouge out the offending images from my soul, but alas, I was too late, my sensibilities pushed over into the abyss, plunging into the bottomless pit of 'Knock Out' purgatory.
What was he or she thinking, this misguided landscaper? I assume this job was "professionally" done since these misshapen demons lay next to the door and walkway of a large medical center whose working doctors and nurses are not likely to moonlight as hedge-trimming psychopaths. But these blobs were even trimmed "wrong" as hedges; the tops and sides wider than the bottom, shading out the lower leaves and destining them to naked stems and thorns. Why remove the blooms? 'Knock Out' cycles rapidly enough that spent blooms go unnoticed amid the off-red tapestry of current flowers. Does no one realize the value of orange rose hips for winter appeal? Where do we go next to misuse this rose? 'Knock Out' topiary? A nice 'Knock Out' elephant with a red saddle on its back and a red stripe along its trunk? A 'Knock Out' clown face with bright red hair?
Please, I beg of you, those who just must plant 'Knock Out', at least give it freedom to still be a rose; to branch stiffly and awkwardly, to bloom a spine-grating red shade and to retain dingy orange hips. Give it the freedom to be more than another green gumdrop in our landscapes. We've got enough shrubs that can be shaped at will into your favorite football mascot. If 'Knock Out' it must be, leave them unfettered and free to grow as they were meant to, as random unshaped colorful masses in our lawns. Please.
Though an old gardener, I am but a young blogger. The humor and added alliteration are free.
Showing posts with label Knock Out. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Knock Out. Show all posts
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Warning; Zealots Crossing
We've all seen them. The bulging eyes moving frantically from side to side seeking an exit. Antic feet sliding sideways in a fruitless attempt to escape. The dazed expressions that signify aural and mental overload. Saliva pooling and drool overflowing as the higher cognitive functions are beaten down and dulled. All of these and more the signs of a normal person trapped in a zealot's snare, unable to fly to freedom against the onrushing tide of words and enthusiasm.
Such was the lot of a few poor souls this week when I gave a Tuesday Talk at the K-State Rose Garden sponsored by The Friends of the KSU Gardens. I'd been tapped several months ago to talk about the Garden and rose history in general during a walk around the rose garden and my anticipation had built up to the boiling point, but at last the scheduled time had arrived. A half-hour came and went in an instant as I poured forth a partially coherent stream of information about rose classes and the AARS and the Gamble Fragrance Award and rose breeders and anti-Knock-Out-ism. No one actually ran from the venue, and no children were permanently scarred by the lecture, but I'm concerned that several attendees will require some recovery time before they can again look at a rose as a simple lovely flower.
Zealots and fanatics can both be defined as being "marked by excessive enthusiasm and often intense uncritical devotion". Synonyms for the words include "rabid", "bigoted," "phrenetic," and "mad." Winston Churchill is quoted as saying "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." All right, I hear all that, but I still don't understand why zealotry is seen as a bad thing.
I put to you that little progress would be made in the World without a zealot or three or four challenging The Man. Yes, the world might be a calmer place and there might be fewer wars, but without a little irrational enthusiasm, little gardening would be done. Who among us would garden if we didn't conveniently forget annually that every year the quail would come to eat the corn before it sprouted, that a late frost would nip the first tomatoes we put out, and that a drought in August will always cause us to carry water daily for the pumpkins? And if some fanatic doesn't pick up the torch of rose snobbery and defend the Old Garden Roses, who among us will stand to speak out against scentless and bland 'Knock Out'?
Somewhere out there, I hope I planted a seed at the lecture. A seed that will grow and cause someone to shun the Big Box Stores and their 'Knock Out's in favor of a real rose. Perhaps an English/Austin hybrid, or a mail-order Gallica, or a hard-won Griffith Buck-bred 'EarthSong' or an EarthKind-recognized rose? A rose worthy of the name rather than just another colored flowering shrub. Such incremental changes are the lifeblood of a zealot and I'm proud to be so labeled if I can cause yet another 'Knock Out' to dry up on the shelf, unpurchased. And, somewhere along the way, provide a little aid and comfort to the Friends of the KSU Gardens.
(Author's note; The picture above is of the "Rose" statue in front of the KSU Rose Garden, surrounded, ironically in light of this blog entry, by 'Livin Easy' roses).
Such was the lot of a few poor souls this week when I gave a Tuesday Talk at the K-State Rose Garden sponsored by The Friends of the KSU Gardens. I'd been tapped several months ago to talk about the Garden and rose history in general during a walk around the rose garden and my anticipation had built up to the boiling point, but at last the scheduled time had arrived. A half-hour came and went in an instant as I poured forth a partially coherent stream of information about rose classes and the AARS and the Gamble Fragrance Award and rose breeders and anti-Knock-Out-ism. No one actually ran from the venue, and no children were permanently scarred by the lecture, but I'm concerned that several attendees will require some recovery time before they can again look at a rose as a simple lovely flower.
Zealots and fanatics can both be defined as being "marked by excessive enthusiasm and often intense uncritical devotion". Synonyms for the words include "rabid", "bigoted," "phrenetic," and "mad." Winston Churchill is quoted as saying "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." All right, I hear all that, but I still don't understand why zealotry is seen as a bad thing.
I put to you that little progress would be made in the World without a zealot or three or four challenging The Man. Yes, the world might be a calmer place and there might be fewer wars, but without a little irrational enthusiasm, little gardening would be done. Who among us would garden if we didn't conveniently forget annually that every year the quail would come to eat the corn before it sprouted, that a late frost would nip the first tomatoes we put out, and that a drought in August will always cause us to carry water daily for the pumpkins? And if some fanatic doesn't pick up the torch of rose snobbery and defend the Old Garden Roses, who among us will stand to speak out against scentless and bland 'Knock Out'?
Somewhere out there, I hope I planted a seed at the lecture. A seed that will grow and cause someone to shun the Big Box Stores and their 'Knock Out's in favor of a real rose. Perhaps an English/Austin hybrid, or a mail-order Gallica, or a hard-won Griffith Buck-bred 'EarthSong' or an EarthKind-recognized rose? A rose worthy of the name rather than just another colored flowering shrub. Such incremental changes are the lifeblood of a zealot and I'm proud to be so labeled if I can cause yet another 'Knock Out' to dry up on the shelf, unpurchased. And, somewhere along the way, provide a little aid and comfort to the Friends of the KSU Gardens.
(Author's note; The picture above is of the "Rose" statue in front of the KSU Rose Garden, surrounded, ironically in light of this blog entry, by 'Livin Easy' roses).
Sunday, May 13, 2012
America triumphs over Knock Out!
Along with many other rose lovers, particularly along with those who like "old" roses, I occasionally go into a funk about the state of the rose industry, curse the day Bill Radler first thought about producing 'Knock Out', and mourn the loss of inventory at the local nurseries. If you're not familiar with the issue, this link, titled "The Rise and Fall of Our National Floral Emblem", explains it pretty well. The article was originally in the American Rose Rambler in 2010.
The outlook has been particularly depressing this year as I wander the local stores and see only Knock Out's and shrub roses. Two prominent local nurseries, who were faithful up until this year, stopped carrying Hybrid Teas, Floribunda's, Grandifloras, or Climbers at all. It is as if 'Peace' and the AARS awards never existed. Even the cheap container roses at the big box stores look more decrepit and lonelier than normal, mere memories of the roses I love.
There, among a great sea of single-flowered 'Rainbow Knock Out's and 'Knock Out' itself, this shopper had spied a single misplaced plant of large-flowered climbing rose 'America', and recognized it for its uniqueness among the heathens. Although I'm not a fan of 'America', Mrs. ProfessorRoush loves the rose, always has loved it, and I grow it although it struggles here in Kansas. In fact, I've lost a couple in tough winters, but my latest has held on four years and, trimmed like a shrub, seems to be vigorously protesting my attempts to restrain it.
In a flash, I think my fellow shopper has shown me the future of roses. It's not that the American public innately prefers the likes of 'Knock Out' and the Drift roses and other landscape roses. It is that the rose industry made prima donnas of roses, commercialized them, branded them, weakened them, and cheapened them. Perhaps it is a good thing that the AARS winners are being shunned. Mostly, they sucked. Blackspotted, cold-sensitive, thorny-caned monsters, we are not rejecting roses, we're rejecting what they have become. We're rejecting novelty color and bling for dependability and health. 'Knock Out' is popular because anyone can grow it south of Zone 3 without care. The fact that 'Knock Out' has no fragrance, simple blooms, and a mild color doesn't matter. What matters is that 'Knock Out' is healthy and doesn't die.
So now, I'm thinking differently. The breeders and nurseries have simply been taught a lesson. Yes, there will be a period of turmoil in the rose-growing world. In the interim, hard-liners, like myself, will turn to smaller specialty mail-order nurseries and the public will just have to put up with they're offered by Big Box. But after that period of time, breeders will again improve the flowers and add scent back to fair rose, and increase the numbers of petals while keeping the rose bush healthy. And we'll have new roses that we love. Different roses, but better roses for it. And the rose industry will rise again. We won't forsake the rose for marigolds and snapdragons. The world is not that crazy.
The outlook has been particularly depressing this year as I wander the local stores and see only Knock Out's and shrub roses. Two prominent local nurseries, who were faithful up until this year, stopped carrying Hybrid Teas, Floribunda's, Grandifloras, or Climbers at all. It is as if 'Peace' and the AARS awards never existed. Even the cheap container roses at the big box stores look more decrepit and lonelier than normal, mere memories of the roses I love.
But yesterday, on a trip to Home Depot to buy some spray paint, I found hope amidst despair. I was wandering by the garden center roses (I still can't resist) and couldn't help but hear a woman exclaim, "Look at this 'Knock Out', Tom." What a great color and so full of petals!" "Oh, and it has a great smell too!"
In a flash, I think my fellow shopper has shown me the future of roses. It's not that the American public innately prefers the likes of 'Knock Out' and the Drift roses and other landscape roses. It is that the rose industry made prima donnas of roses, commercialized them, branded them, weakened them, and cheapened them. Perhaps it is a good thing that the AARS winners are being shunned. Mostly, they sucked. Blackspotted, cold-sensitive, thorny-caned monsters, we are not rejecting roses, we're rejecting what they have become. We're rejecting novelty color and bling for dependability and health. 'Knock Out' is popular because anyone can grow it south of Zone 3 without care. The fact that 'Knock Out' has no fragrance, simple blooms, and a mild color doesn't matter. What matters is that 'Knock Out' is healthy and doesn't die.
So now, I'm thinking differently. The breeders and nurseries have simply been taught a lesson. Yes, there will be a period of turmoil in the rose-growing world. In the interim, hard-liners, like myself, will turn to smaller specialty mail-order nurseries and the public will just have to put up with they're offered by Big Box. But after that period of time, breeders will again improve the flowers and add scent back to fair rose, and increase the numbers of petals while keeping the rose bush healthy. And we'll have new roses that we love. Different roses, but better roses for it. And the rose industry will rise again. We won't forsake the rose for marigolds and snapdragons. The world is not that crazy.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Charity, Wisdom, and Snooty Gardener-Husbands
Someone said it ages past; "Charity begins at home." "Charity" in this reference means either its second definition in the free online Webster dictionary, "generosity and helpfulness especially toward the needy or suffering", or in its fourth definition, "lenient judgment of others."
I'm referring in this instance to charity extended to poor, misguided Mrs. ProfessorRoush. We were out for a meal the other evening and leaving the fairly new Olive Garden's restaurant together, when she looked down near the sidewalk and stunned me momentarily speechless with the words, "Oh, those are pretty, are those geraniums?"
She was referring, of course, to the heat-damaged Knock Out roses lining the sidewalk of this new commercial development. Faded and sun-burnt, but Knock Outs nonetheless. My regular readers know full well my opinions of Knock Out, but for those who don't, I'd refer you to my earlier blog titled Anti-Knock Out Cultivarist.
I was only mildly surprised that she called them geraniums (to give her the benefit of the doubt, they were quite misshapen and discoloured from 10 days of plus-100 temperatures), but I was highly offended that she called them "pretty." Various retorts tumbled around in my brain for awhile, ranging from those which were merely pitying of her tastelessness to the beginnings of a profane rant, but my husbandly instincts thankfully kicked in and slowed my tongue from answers that would have resulted in a myriad of possible spousal sentences ranging from silent pouting to banishment to the couch for upwards of a week. After all, Mrs. ProfessorRoush and I have been married nigh on 29 years and even a slow-witted, opinionated and socially-untrainable husband will develop some rudimentary survival instincts in that lengthy time period.
Monday, July 11, 2011
Sustainable Rose
It seems to have been a long time since I blogged about a current reading, but I've been skipping among several gardening books and catching up on my fiction as well. The summer heat is setting in and I'm beginning to do less and less in the garden during the weekend afternoons, but I do relish the chance to pick up my garden reading. I seem to do most of my garden reading in two seasons, at the height of summer and in the dead of winter, but I suppose that makes some logical sense.
One recent text that I'm finishing, though, is The Sustainable Rose Garden, a 2010 Newbury Books publication edited by Pat Shanley, Peter Kukielski, and Gene Waering. The book is a collection of essays (sometimes supplemented by a poem or short note), and it is beautifully illustrated. All the essays are directed at some aspect of breeding or growing disease-resistant roses, or at practices in rose culture that utilize less synthetic fertilizers and artificial chemicals.
The essays will not all be useful for all readers (chapters on Tea Roses, for instance, won't help rosarians who live in Zone 5, such as myself), but there are ideas to be gleamed from most all the writings. The big bonuses though, are essays by well-known rosarians and rose hybridizers, such as Stephen Scanniello, Viru Viraraghavan, Jeri Jennings, and Jeff Wyckoff. There is a whole lot of information here, including a great description of the EarthKind™ program where I learned that there is a small EarthKind trial going on right here in Kansas.
The highlight of the book for me, however, was a chapter written by William J. Radler, the Radler of 'Knock Out®' rose fame, titled Talking About My Work With Roses. It is essentially a history of his interest in roses, his breeding program, and a listing and description of his current introductions. It is fascinating, for instance that he does not leave the testing of blackspot resistance up to the whims of a particular summer's weather, but describes how he collects diseased leaves early in the season, drys and powderizes them, and then sprays it over the rose garden wetting down all the leaves; in essence creating a worse-case scenario of disease to test his seedings. I learned a number of interesting facts, including the revelation that the original 'Knock Out' took 11 years to get to market, while his shortest time of a rose to market has been 7 years. And I learned how 'Knock Out' got its name. The list and description of the currently-introduced Radler roses is informative, telling us which ones were sports from others or were genetically different seedlings from similar crossings. And there are numerous tidbits and advice from Mr. Radler about dealing with horticultural mistakes, companion plantings, and tips for using roses in the design of the garden.
It is comforting to know that William Radler, with six employees who help with the rose research and development, views his biggest challenge as "keeping ahead of the weeds." Sound familiar? I guess we don't need a lifetime of dedication to roses, a degree in landscape architecture, or recognition, fame and fortune to share some of the basic challenges of gardening; we just need a kinship with the soil.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)